Monday, November 16, 2009

Interesting Astrological meaning of the Birth of Christ?

On Dec. 24,Sirius (Star in the East) is aligned with the 3 brightest stars in Orion Belt, also referred to as the 3 Kings. On Dec. 25 the Sun rises and is in perfect alignment with all 4 stars. Could this be the origination of the story of the Birth of Christ? The 3 Kings follow the Star in the East to witness the Birth of the Son of God.





The Consellation Virgo (Virgin in Latin) is represented with the ancient glyph symbolizing the letter "M." Virgo is also referred to as the House of Bread because it rules the months of Havests Aug-Sept., and Bethlehem happens to translates to the same-House of Bread. Similar to the story of the Son of God being born of a Virgin named "M"ary in Bethlehem?

Interesting Astrological meaning of the Birth of Christ?
December 25 used to be the sun god Mithra's birthday in the religion Christianity was competing with and almost being driven into the ground by. Recognizing a good opportunity when they saw it to help pagans make a smoother transition to Christianity, church fathers usurped the sun god's birthday and turned it into the Son of God's birthday. Slick! They weren't dummies.
Reply:Interesting also is that with each of the universal educators, there were various others with the same claims at the same time. That's why it was so difficult for their contemporaries to sort through who was real and who wasn't. Report It

Reply:Well, the major problem I see with it is that Dec 25 is not Jesus' real birthday. It's merely the day that was chosen (for whatever reason) to be the celebration mass.
Reply:Directly quoted from Zeitgeist. *Sigh*





December 25th was NOT Jesus's birthday, and most Christians know this. He was most likely born in September. December was chosen to help convert the pagans ("Accept this, go to heaven, AND keep all of your holidays!"). I thought everyone knew this.





Edit: I watched the first twenty minutes of Zeitgeist, and it was so full of inaccuracies and outright LIES that I couldn't bring myself to watch the rest of it. I refuse to watch fiction that's labeled as a documentary. If I wanted to be lied to, all I'd have to do is pick up a newspaper, or listen to any politician. No thanks.


Zeitgeist is not original. The religious part of it is based off of books like The Golden Bough by James George Frazer and Riddle of Resurrection: "Dying and Rising Gods" in the Ancient Near East by Tryggve N. D. Mettinger.


As I said, not original. I stopped watching soon after Zeigeist claimed that Horus was called the son of God (he was either the Child, the Elder, or the Son of Isis, depending on which region of Egypt and the time. There were three different Horuses in Egyptian mythology), that he was crucified (he was killed by Sut, or Set, daily, and none of the myths say HOW he was killed), that he was buried in a tomb and resurrected after three days (Egyptian mythology never states where he was buried, and he was resurrected daily with the rising of the sun)...


It's obvious that the writers of Zeitgeist had no idea what they were talking about. What's worse is that people believe it, and seem to think that movies like that make people think. No, movies like that make me ANGRY (because people believe it), and they make me laugh because they're so utterly stupid and poorly researched.
Reply:This is gonna sound like a crap answer, but I believe that the reason we celebrate the birth of Christ when we do is NOT because that's when he was born. It's because when the Romans converted to Christianity, December 25 was already a religious holiday for its people, and it made it easier to convert the nation if it didn't change its holidays. I know, it sounds REALLY dumb, but if I remember correctly, Jesus' supposed birthdate was more in Jan/Feb.
Reply:I saw that video too. It was very interesting. It makes a lot of sense too. I wonder how many Christians realize that their entire faith is based on astrology, the very thing they call evil.

skin rash

No comments:

Post a Comment